Wikipedia Removed Zika Studies Mug by RoseWrites

I saw a few glaring omissions on the Wikipedia page called "Zika fever" so I added crucial information with citations. However, within three hours, every study I cited was removed. And, I filmed it all: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2ZuG12yM0E&t Sources included: Arbovirus survey in wild birds in Uganda (Okia et al. 1971) http://www.infobarrel.com/Birds_as_Reservoir_Hosts_of_Zika_What_You_Are_Not_Being_Told Dr. Constancia Ayres in Fiocruz Recife has shown that a far more common mosquito, Culex quinquefasciatus, which breeds in dirty water (Aedes aegypti mostly breeds in clean water), can be infected with Zika virus in the lab. Source: https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2016/apr/12/on-front-line-brazil-war-zika-virus-i-felt-horror-movie-no-cure Dr. Duschinka Guedes presented strong evidence that "in Recife, Brazil, both Aedes aegypti and Cules quinquefasciatus are vectors" of the Zika virus. Source: https://f1000research.com/articles/5-2546/v1 In September 2016, a study by Guo et al. concluded: "These laboratory results clearly demonstrate the potential role of Cx. p. quinquefasciatus as a vector of ZIKV in China. Because there are quite different vector management strategies required to control Aedes (Stegomyia) species and Cx. p. quinquefasciatus, an integrated approach may be required should a Zika epidemic occur." Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27599470?dopt=Abstract Wolbachia spp. should be further evaluated as causes of human infection, especially as Wolbachia infection of mosquitoes is increasingly considered to be a tool for interfering with mosquito-borne transmission of human pathogens. Source: http://www.clinicalmicrobiologyandinfection.com/article/S1198-743X(14)00040-8/fulltext